Consideration of the question whether in disciplinary cases connected with accidents, where after holding an accident enquiry a furnish the accused employee with a copy of the evidence recorded during the accident enquiry and then to give him an opportunity to cross examine the witnesses, etc. or it is necessary to record the evidence to be relied on a fresh in presence of the accused. Decision that in all disciplinary cases where it is proposed to impose on the Railway servant concerned the penalty of dismissal, removal compulsory retirement or reduction the statements of the witnesses already recorded in the fact-finding enquiry or the accident enquiry, as the case may be, should be recorded as fresh in the presence of the accused in the subsequent statutory departmental enquiry so as to comply with the provision of article 311/2 of the constitution

Keywords	Administrative Vigilance Division Calcutta V.B. Ahuja
Department	Ministry of Railway
Branch	Establishment Discipline and Appeal
From Year / Date (YYYY-MM-DD)	1959
To Year / Date (YYYY-MM-DD)	1959
Identifier	PR_211200018847
File No.	E/DandA/59RG6-38/1-4
Location	Repository-4
File Size	25.6 MB
Pages	28
Collection	Digitized Public Records Ministry of Railway
Language	English